Colquitt et al. (2019) empirical content-validation benchmarks
Source:R/colquitt_benchmarks.R
colquitt_benchmarks.RdReturns the empirical interpretation bands proposed by Colquitt et al. (2019) for Psa, Csv, HTC, or HTD. The benchmarks were created from scale-level averages for 112 scales and are percentile-based norms, not universal psychometric cutoffs.
If orbiting_r is supplied, the correlation-conditional benchmark set is
selected. Otherwise the overall, non-correlation-normed criteria are used.
The published table contains a few rounded boundary overlaps/gaps. This implementation treats each printed lower bound as the start of its category and assigns categories from strongest to weakest, yielding deterministic interpretation at rounded boundaries.
Usage
colquitt_benchmarks(
statistic = c("psa", "csv", "htc", "htd"),
orbiting_r = NULL
)References
Colquitt, J. A., Sabey, T. B., Rodell, J. B., & Hill, E. T. (2019). Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(10), 1243-1265. doi:10.1037/apl0000406
Examples
colquitt_benchmarks("psa")
#> statistic benchmark_set benchmark_label interpretation
#> 1 psa overall Overall (not correlation-normed) Very Strong
#> 2 psa overall Overall (not correlation-normed) Strong
#> 3 psa overall Overall (not correlation-normed) Moderate
#> 4 psa overall Overall (not correlation-normed) Weak
#> 5 psa overall Overall (not correlation-normed) Lack of
#> percentile minimum
#> 1 80th-99th 0.91
#> 2 60th-79th 0.82
#> 3 40th-59th 0.72
#> 4 20th-39th 0.39
#> 5 0th-19th -Inf
colquitt_benchmarks("csv", orbiting_r = .40)
#> statistic benchmark_set benchmark_label
#> 1 csv moderate More moderate focal-orbiting correlation (.35-.50)
#> 2 csv moderate More moderate focal-orbiting correlation (.35-.50)
#> 3 csv moderate More moderate focal-orbiting correlation (.35-.50)
#> 4 csv moderate More moderate focal-orbiting correlation (.35-.50)
#> 5 csv moderate More moderate focal-orbiting correlation (.35-.50)
#> interpretation percentile minimum
#> 1 Very Strong 80th-99th 0.83
#> 2 Strong 60th-79th 0.61
#> 3 Moderate 40th-59th 0.52
#> 4 Weak 20th-39th 0.01
#> 5 Lack of 0th-19th -Inf