An ordered-categorical version of nomo_demo_continuous. The same latent item responses (before missing values were introduced) were cut into five ordered response categories, as is typical of Likert-type rating scales. This dataset supports polychoric factor-retention, ordinal EFA, WLSMV CFA, and ordinal reliability examples.
Format
A data frame with 500 rows and 10 ordered factors with levels
"1" < "2" < "3" < "4" < "5":
- a1, a2, a3, a4, a5
Ordered indicators written for factor A (
a5cross-loads on factor B).- b1, b2, b3, b4, b5
Ordered indicators written for factor B (
b5is weak).
Details
Latent responses were thresholded at -1.80, -0.80, 0.20, and 1.20, so the observed distributions lean toward the upper categories. The dataset has no missing values, which keeps the first ordinal examples focused on estimator and correlation choices rather than on missing-data handling for categorical models.
Examples
str(nomo_demo_ordinal)
#> 'data.frame': 500 obs. of 10 variables:
#> $ a1: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 2 3 4 2 5 3 3 2 3 4 ...
#> $ a2: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 1 2 3 2 3 5 3 3 4 5 ...
#> $ a3: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 2 4 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 5 ...
#> $ a4: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 ...
#> $ a5: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 1 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 2 ...
#> $ b1: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 2 3 5 4 3 2 3 3 3 2 ...
#> $ b2: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 4 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 2 3 ...
#> $ b3: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 2 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 ...
#> $ b4: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 4 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 2 2 ...
#> $ b5: Ord.factor w/ 5 levels "1"<"2"<"3"<"4"<..: 3 4 5 4 3 2 4 5 3 2 ...
table(nomo_demo_ordinal$a1)
#>
#> 1 2 3 4 5
#> 13 105 179 145 58